case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-12 03:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #3721 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3721 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.















Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-13 08:18 am (UTC)(link)
but with the modern characters who bear only a superficial resemblance to ACD's characters.

But that's the point. Fans of the BBC series love the characters as they are in the BBC series. It's those characters we want to see in the original setting, because it seems like it would be fun to see the characters we love in that setting.

There are a few ACD fans out there who get all exasperated and say, "If you want to see Holmes and Watson in Victorian England, why don't you just read the original stories?" But those fans are often the same fans (aka purists) who are going "Ugh, BBC Sherlock is such an awful bastardization of Sherlock Holmes. It's not true to the stories or the characters in the least." Meanwhile, the BBC fans are like, "THAT'S WHY WE DON'T JUST READ THE ORIGINAL STORIES. Because it isn't THOSE characters we love and want to see have adventures in Victorian England; it's the BBC John and Sherlock - who, as you just said, are NOT THE SAME as the ACD Holmes and Watson."

(I do think OP's secret was unclearly worded though, if this is what they were getting at.)

(Anonymous) 2017-03-13 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I understand that, you don't have to explain it. I still think it's funny.