case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-18 04:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #3727 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3727 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 55 secrets from Secret Submission Post #533.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-19 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think this is quite right, at least if I was going to use this phrase.

I think it makes more sense to apply it to characters where no explicit age is given (whether because it's a kids show or because there just isn't enough content).

The 3000 year old anime vampire isn't in "code". If you want to argue someone is a pedo you can just say "you're using her fictional age as an excuse because her canonical appearance turns you on".

As with many phrases adopted by these people, it's not a useless concept they're just abusing it.