case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-11 07:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #3873 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3873 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


















03. [SPOILERS for Okja]



__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for possible discussion of child abuse]

(Top of the Lake)

__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of rape]
http://i.imgur.com/is8E7se.jpg
[Twin Peaks 2017, linked for TV-sex]

__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for possible discussion of abuse]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #554.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2017-08-12 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
I have nothing to say about the show itself but if Hollywood doesn't want to pay to take chances, why should I take a chance with my money and a stupid tentpole?

Maybe instead of dropping 200 million dollars on old concepts no one wanted, give midbudget projects a shot or a sequel.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed. Hollywood doesn't seem much interested in taking even lower budget risks these days, though. But on the bright side, I think it's interesting that TV has stepped in to take up some of that slack. There are projects like Game of Thrones or American Gods that would've never worked as a movie.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
They do make them. All the f'ing time. Go watch them.

And they drop 200 million on the old concepts because EVERYONE wants them. Have you seen how much all the Disney movies have made?
morieris: (Azula - Amoenus)

[personal profile] morieris 2017-08-12 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
A) I do B) 200 million dollars worth of people certainly did not want King Arthur.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
They don't make as much midbudget stuff as they used to or as they should. That's an actual trend that exists.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Go where to watch them? Some are getting made but it's fewer than ever before and they aren't getting distributed. People want those mid budget films in their local cinemas and it's ridiculous for you to suggest they're already there. It doesn't make sense for Hollywood to make them anymore because people will balk at paying blockbuster prices for mid budget films. It's not like the studios, distributors, and cinema chains are suddenly going to agree to lower ticket prices. And those ticket prices have proven that profits can continue to break records despite less people buying the tickets than ever before. So we're left frustrated with little recourse but to voice our complaints.