case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-11 07:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #3873 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3873 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


















03. [SPOILERS for Okja]



__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for possible discussion of child abuse]

(Top of the Lake)

__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of rape]
http://i.imgur.com/is8E7se.jpg
[Twin Peaks 2017, linked for TV-sex]

__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for possible discussion of abuse]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #554.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
It's hard to answer because I'm not OP. But presumably, they watch it because they enjoy it, while also thinking that some aspects of it are bad to them. I don't see what's incorrect about reacting to something like that - liking parts of it and disliking others.

And no, I'm not a huge Twin Peaks fan, I just think it's bizarre that people would scrutinize David Lynch's work using 21st century sociopolitical standards because it's inevitably going to come up short by design.

I wouldn't talk about it in terms of "scrutiny" and "coming up short". I think using that lens can help understand different aspects of the work. I don't think people who are using that lens are necessarily going to use it to dismiss the show entirely. OP certainly doesn't seem to have done so.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-12 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't say it was "incorrect," and I'm not "policing" anyone.