case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-09-08 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3901 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3901 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/YVM0ZQW.png
[link for nudity/porn (illustrated)]


__________________________________________________






04. [SPOILERS for Tokyo Ghoul]

[Tokyo Ghoul, character is Kureo Mado]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Persona 5]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Defenders]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for non-con maybe? I am not sure]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-08 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You say you're not a snob, but it sounds kinda snobby to me

(Anonymous) 2017-09-08 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know, would you call someone an art snob for pointing out an oil painting is not a watercolor? Or that something with color in it is not grayscale?

(Anonymous) 2017-09-08 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
mmm, but I think it's reasonable to recognize that the term is being used to convey style. sometimes that's just how words evolve. and when people insist on semantics, they do tend to get called snobs.

(Anonymous) 2017-09-08 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
But not all distinctions are on the level of oil painting versus watercolor. That's not necessarily a valid comparison. There are distinctions that exist which are pedantic.