fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3151 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3151 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[DRAMAtical Murder]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Ruby Tandoh]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Sex&Drugs&Rock&Roll]

__________________________________________________

05.

(Anastasia Romanov)

__________________________________________________

06.

[Chris Lilley]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Surge concerto]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Starsky and Hutch]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Ragnarok Online & Tree of Savior]

__________________________________________________

10.

[purplekecleon/floraverse]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

That's not what the secret says, though. Nobody in this thread has actually bothered to look at the content of her Twitter, they've only googled her, found out she's gay and that's it. Since the OP hasn't mentioned her sexual orientation at all, assuming that the OP equates gay with being an SJW is jumping to conclusions.

Okay but let's be real, knowing F!S's knee-jerk reaction to anything SJW, I'm probably not that far off.

Kneejerk reaction? You mean like people who don't even follow her just glanced briefly at her profile?

If OP was following then obviously they had a lot more exposure to her than glancing at her profile.

No one has a problem with social justice, but SJW are a special breed of bullies and slacktivism so of course they have a problem. They make it their mission to make everyone else feel uncomfortable and judged.

The problem is that everyone has a different definition, and SJW can mean "calling out aka bullying about things they find offensive that I don't find offensive".

+1 So many people on this thread have no idea who this woman is or what opinions she's expressed, but they're convinced she can't be an SJW because... why? Because she's beautiful and gay? Major eyerolls.

No, people doubt that she's an SJW because no one has presented any evidence that she's an SJW or anything close to it, and because assholes have started using the label 'SJW' for anyone even remotely in favor of tolerance.

If you want to show that she's bad in some way, you need to provide actual evidence of that. Of course people are going to assume that she's fine, in the absence of that.

We're not convinced because the only noticeable things about her that "could be"
Sjw or tumblr snowflake is her sexuality. There's no evidence! Nothing of note! If you can't comprehend that from everyone's confusion on what this person has supposedly done, maybe you and OP are the ones at fault?

The reason that some people don't take the term SJW seriously anymore is because it's now migrated to the point where people use it as a label that lets them automatically dismiss anyone who has an argument related to social justice without even considering what they have to say. Huge swaths of the people who use the term have an enormous and obvious problem with social justice.

In other words, it's you assholes' own fault that people don't take the term seriously anymore.

Also, OP provided not one shred of evidence of any unreasonable opinion or statement, so it's quite hard to take them seriously.

Op of the secret doesn't say anything of use, that's why we are all confused. This whole thread is about people getting to work out what is sjw and coming up with nothing, so you're wrong.

I've googled her to find out anything that tumblr would like. After reading through news articles and checking out her Twitter the only noticeable thing that I could tilt my head to see as 'like tumblr' or 'special snowflake' is that she came out recently. That's it. There's literally nothing else that is noticeable.

But nice try jumping to conclusions. Maybe if you have some kind of info on what is so special snowflake about this chick because none of us can find anything and OP offers no info.

[ SECRET POST #3151 ]

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.

Re: She's gay. That's it.