case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-03-14 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3723 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3723 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.



02. [repeat]


[Elementary, Sherlock/Fiona]


[Bucky Barnes]




[Rumer and Scout Willis]


[George R.R. Martin, ASOIAF]


Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-15 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
I have a similar problem with Harry Potter. Like, I'd never say it anywhere but here but all the head canons about Howarts actually being great for disabled/lgbt/ethnic minority/religious minority folks don't at all jive with what we see.
mimi_sardinia: (Default)

[personal profile] mimi_sardinia 2017-03-15 09:22 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I don't think that would work. Dumbledore may have reduced pureblood influence a bit during his time as headmaster, but it was still there, and I totally see purebloods as being intolerant of a lot of things besides blood purity issues, including LGBT, religion, skin colour and disability.

Pureblood kids would harass and bully any of those groups.

(Anonymous) 2017-03-15 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the fact that Hogwarts being a diversity lovefest in headcanons should tell people a lot. For starters, that if it was canon, you wouldn't need headcanon it?

(Anonymous) 2017-03-16 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose that can be debated at least as far as religions and ethnicity, since purebloods can be pretty much anyone. But any building with staircases that move around whenever they want to isn't going to be disability-friendly.