case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-05-11 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3781 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3781 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

[The Magnificent Seven (2016 remake)]


[Guardians of the Galaxy 2]


[Rogue One]


[Parks and Rec]


[The Rocketeer: Jennifer Connelly/Timothy Dalton, Billy Campbell]


[Mean Girls]


[Peter "ppd" Dager (Team Evil Genius), Dota 2 Esport]


[Life (2017)]


Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #541.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
j_lunatic: Caniculae commoda (Default)

[personal profile] j_lunatic 2017-05-11 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends on which older westerns you mean. Some were prestige pictures, made by the studios' higher-end actors, directors, and cinematographers. Other were B-quality or poorer, turned out on the cheap to subsidize the A-list productions. And if you're talking about the sort of Poverty Row titles that survive only in well-worn 16mm TV prints, they can look pretty dire next to modern digital productions.
ketita: (Default)

[personal profile] ketita 2017-05-11 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not claiming there isn't a spectrum in terms of older films and older Westerns. Of course some are better and some worse.
It just seemed to me that OP was claiming that new Westerns would have good cinematography, and I don't think there's any guarantee of that.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-12 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not seeing that in the secret at all. OP says they wish westerns were more popular because they like gorgeous modern cinematography, etc. If westerns were more popular, there'd be more of them made and OP's chances of getting good cinematography are increased. I don't think there's any assumption that it's guaranteed.