case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-07 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #3869 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3869 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.



[Doctor Who]




[Mandy Patinkin and Okieriete “Oak” Onaodowan in Natasha, Pierre & the Great Comet of 1812]


[Parks and Rec]


[Agent Tammy Preston in Twin Peaks]


[Doctor Who, Eighth Doctor]


Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #554.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-08 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Commonly and accurately are two different things. The problem with defining sexuality by gender is it leads to a lot of harassment of homosexuals who are solely same-sex interested.

If you want to define attraction by gender you need separate terms that don't have SEX in the word.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-08 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, I think that when a large chunk of bisexuals start using those definitions for their sexuality then it becomes accurate... But okay sure.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-08 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
calm down terf nonny, no one's forcing you to like trans women

(Anonymous) 2017-08-09 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Can you please not act like there aren't shitty people who expect us to disregard sex even though we're only attracted to one sex? Like. That is a thing.

(Anonymous) 2017-08-09 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
there are people like that

there are also people obsessed with the idea of people like that existing and pretending as if it's a massive societal issue.