case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-08-10 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3872 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3872 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.















Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #554.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thewakokid: (Default)

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-08-10 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Dammmit, I don't want to play devils advocate here...

But the passing of 7 years is no indication that they now think any different. Going 7 years without voicing an opinion that landed them in the shit is not indicative that they think any different.

I've changed some of my opinions from 7 years ago, but others I am even more sure of now than I was 7 years ago.

not OP

(Anonymous) 2017-08-10 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right, but at the same time I don't the idea of continuing to condemn someone without evidence that they're still the same kind of person.

Obviously there are some things that I cannot overlook, but in general I feel this way.

also not OP

(Anonymous) 2017-08-11 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I think if there were no indications in either direction, I'd prefer to err on the side of giving them the benefit of the doubt. It depends on what they said/did, because something really do need an apology or some form of accounting for what happened, and should not just be swept under the rug.