Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-11-03 05:54 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #5051 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5051 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #723.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-11-04 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)I was neutral on feet until a few years ago, when I met someone who IS HIGHLY into it. I gave it a try, tried to understand it, and can totally understand the appeal.
I'm NOT into dirty feet of strangers, or anything like that. I prefer to know where the feet have been and if the "dirtiness" is "safe" at the very-least.
I can get why people wouldn't find them VISUALLY appealing, though. There are a LOT of different types of feet out there and there can even be preferences within the fetish itself.
As a woman, I think female feet tend to be more appealing over most male feet -- though there are exceptions, for example.
My only problem is the insult to those that like the fetish (even before I cared), or label it as dirty in and of itself without seeing if said people like them clean, dirty, natural, etc. Once again: There are dirtier parts, after all.
On the other side, like I said: If they're visually unappealing to you? Totally get it.