[ SECRET POST #7077 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #7077 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________










02. [SPOILERS for Tiger and Bunny Season 2]




__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Wrestlemania]




__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Invincible (TV show) and maybe comics]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of SA, child abuse]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1010.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Having worked in administration for lawyers, I can tell you they absolutely understand that their client probably did it, but it's their job to argue the case FOR them, not against them.

TBH I also don't understand how someone can just take complete control of their morals and toss them out the window in favor of winning the case for the perp, but that's just my sense of justice and fairness.

[(Anonymous)]

As I understand it (this is all in the case of the ones who have a conscience because yeah sure there are also attorneys who really don't care, as there will always be some people who don't care about others) they're not hoping to win, they're hoping that with all the evidence they have, it will correctly be determined that that evidence isn't satisfactory and that the evidence pointing to guilt will be correctly determined greater.

Like, even if they lose, they still got paid to do their job, so there's no incentive for them to hope their guilty client is found innocent just in order to win.

[philstar22]

This right here. When it comes to criminal, the burden is on the government to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the person is guilty. As it should be. The burden is high for a reason. Criminal attorneys make sure to hold the government to their burden.

There are bad defense attorneys out there for sure. But most of them just believe in the system and that everyone should have the same protections.