case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-08-22 04:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #1327 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1327 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.


__________________________________________________



171.



Notes:

Just as a note: no fandom will ever be blanket-banned, don't worry.



Secrets Left to Post: 12 pages, 282 secrets from Secret Submission Post #190.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2010-08-22 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP, but my concern isn't who tops or bottoms or which is more IC for whom, but that the "bottom" isn't immediately written off as a whiny weakling in need of a "real man" to show him the way of True Love through taking it up the ass. Unfortunately, that's the way it goes in most slash, and Inception has not been immune.

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-08-22 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
lmao, yeah, that's OP's complaint all right. Her complaint is that it should be EAMES taking it up the ass like a little bitch. When the most popular comment so far in this thread is...

"come read my fic, then. Arthur is large and in charge and him and Eames switch, but he tops most often. i don't see how people think Eames is a top."

... you sure do come away with the impression that the Inception fandom truly cares about fucked-up gender issues in slash, boy howdy.

(Anonymous) 2010-08-22 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it just means that fandom has gotten sick of Arthur being the primary subject of the weak bottom trope and wants to see some variety. We can hope for equal standing in their relationship/sex life, but this is slash fandom on the internet, no one is setting their expectations up very high for porn.

Idk man, maybe it's just me, but I kind of hope it isn't?

(Anonymous) 2010-08-22 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
as the author of that comment i'd like to say that i actually do avoid tired old gender tropes in my work, and Eames being a bottom has little to do with his personality and more to do with the way i perceive his sexual preferences. he just seems like a guy who wants to come undone in the bedroom, whereas Arthur likes to be in control. however, like i said, they do switch. (and i realize that there are many facets to that dynamic - power bottoms, etc - and that the top is not always unequivocally in charge).

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-08-23 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
as the author of that comment i'd like to say that i actually do avoid tired old gender tropes in my work, and Eames being a bottom has little to do with his personality and more to do with the way i perceive his sexual preferences. he just seems like a guy who wants to come undone in the bedroom, whereas Arthur likes to be in control. however, like i said, they do switch. (and i realize that there are many facets to that dynamic - power bottoms, etc - and that the top is not always unequivocally in charge).

I'm not trying to say anything one way or another about how you write your stories. I'm saying I think it's straight-up disgusting that this secret listed bottoming in anal sex -- oh I'm sorry, "taking it up the arse" -- something that is the focus of 90% of homophobia (the only "bitches" in prisons are the ones who GET fucked, after all), as character assassination on par with cowardice and flaky indecision and weakness -- maybe even equated all these traits -- and everyone's reaction was just "yeah that sucks, give us better fic" instead of "ummm what the fuck."

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that's what the secret was saying at all. In fact I'd argue that that is exactly what the OP is saying s/he doesn't want. There is nothing wrong with the character enjoying bottoming. But it's the way in which it is being written that is tiresome. Rather than both parties being portrayed as equal partners in the relationship, Arthur is being portrayed as - like you said - a "bitch" who needs a cock up his ass because of his flakiness/indecision.
It's the stereotypical uke/seme trope, which is offensive, because it forces one character into a stereotypically "male" role in a relationship and the other into a stereotypically "female" role in a relationship, thus ignoring their individual character traits just so the author can write HOT PRONZ!

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-08-23 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
Come on, now, anon. You saw the replies to the comment at the top here. People aren't upset because of the unequal power dynamics being ~offensive.~ They just want the unequal power dynamics to go in the other direction, even just for variety.

And that's... OKAY. It's not offensive to like a relationship where the couple isn't "equal partners," whatever that means. Especially in porn, where that's often the hottest part. But I will never be able to understand why people can't just own their preferences without shitting all over other those of others, and in this case, as a special bonus, throwing around some truly impressive homophobic sentiments while they're at it.

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
But I will never be able to understand why people can't just own their preferences without shitting all over other those of others, and in this case, as a special bonus, throwing around some truly impressive homophobic sentiments while they're at it.

I don't know you and you don't know me, but I love you for this comment. A+

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
See, I don't see it like that. I'd say the reason people here are wanting more bottom!Eames is because 1) there aren't too many fics where Eames is a bottom in the first place, and 2) it would be difficult to write him in the uke stereotype. The author wouldn't be as easily dragged into writing one character as an ukey bottom because he's pretty/slim/whatever and the other character as a dominating seme because he's bigger/muscular/outspoken/whatever. It would hypothetically result in a better, less cliche fic.

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
re: 2)
You cannot seriously believe that. Are you new to fandom or something?

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
There's no point in engaging this person, she loves shitting all over anyone who disagrees with her about who's bottoming.

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, thanks. After the other lolRAEG comments I got from her (including the one in the thread below this, what the hell), I recalled that I've seen her wank about before on f!s and gave up. Oh well. Will keep it in mind for future reference!

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-08-23 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
lol, it's you again, my secret hatemirer. Stalked any love memes that don't list you lately?

I've never seen Inception, btw.

SHE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE

(Anonymous) 2010-08-23 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Re: SHE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-08-23 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
PERHAPS

my anger is not actually from specific character topping/bottoming preferences as was previously suggested, which would in this case be impossible

but from something a bit more... PRINCIPLE-like in nature???

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM