Nah, I think it would still be "queerplatonic" because it's not the non-straight meaning of queer, but the original "weird/strange" meaning.
Not to say I don't think the word is stupid, though. I've seen some people use "quasiplatonic" instead which I think probably fits the concept they're trying to go for better.
Re: Question about a thread from yesterday...
Nah, I think it would still be "queerplatonic" because it's not the non-straight meaning of queer, but the original "weird/strange" meaning.
Not to say I don't think the word is stupid, though. I've seen some people use "quasiplatonic" instead which I think probably fits the concept they're trying to go for better.