case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-02-03 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #4049 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4049 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #580.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-04 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay?
bcboomerangs: <user name=oraclegreen> (sc: booyah fordham law)

[personal profile] bcboomerangs 2018-02-05 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, Jupiter Ascending was the masterpiece movie my 13-15 year old self needed. It remains the most ridiculous and over-the-top what-the-fuck movie I’ve ever seen. And I love every minute of it.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-05 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
That's probably why she wrote

"I kind of agree and disagree."

She wasn't claiming to totally agree with the secret writer. She agreed with it partway, but there was an exception to her agreement.
otakugal15: (Default)

Re: How detailed do you get when tagging smut?

[personal profile] otakugal15 2018-02-05 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
If I write smut, it's as simple as this:

smut, nsfw, 18+,

That's it.

If I write something with rape in it or implied rape, I'll add:

rape, (or) implied rape,

I don't do that tw:rape crap. The damn word is PLENTY enough of a warning.

Re: Not OP

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
it's something because you're right, she is really cute!

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm hearing good things too, but Supernatural....I've been burned by you before!!

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Frankly, if they would just pull the damn trigger and put him in a romantic relationship with Dean instead of *hinting* it, then they could use THAT as an excuse to limit his powers. Angel sex drains sex or something, sheesh, it's not like this show is even particularly adherent to ITS own canon....

(Anonymous) 2018-02-06 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
NA
The brothers' BS is so tired and circular nowadays, I legit groan out loud and turn it off if there is any mention of it and there's not Castiel or Jody or someone to take my mind off it.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-07 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
not an excuse anymore. it's time to get over the few fans you still hate and stop forcing all villain fans to preemptively prove themselves to you, because you probably ignore tons of fans who don't do that. many hero stans are also obnoxious and policing but nobody forces them to acknowledge their faces aren't perfect.

(Anonymous) 2018-02-07 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Fandom was built on this type of snobbery, and old habits die hard.
osidiano: A chibi Metroid (mmhmm)

[personal profile] osidiano 2018-03-13 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed! *high-fives* (plus it is definitely not any worse than so many of the truly cringey Chosen-Boy narratives that get made into movies ever year, and I can’t get my mind around how ‘bees sense royalty’ is any more ridiculous than ‘Anakin was born of a virgin birth’)

Page 12 of 12