I can't tell if you're mocking me or not. Regardless, calling a character a Stu without having watched the source material is stupid; but calling a character a Stu when you have watched the source material, and said character is clearly NOT a Stu, is even more retarded, because it shows that the person in question doesn't actually understand the term. Being a badass with lots of admirers =/= being a Stu. In order to be a canon Sue/Stu, the character has to be PERFECT, incapable of making any real mistakes, and have no realistic failings. Few canon Sues truly exist, and the Doctor is certainly not one of them. Richard Rahl, on the other hand...