nayrt but I think ayrt's point is, if you distrust "Big Pharma" and are squicked out about the idea of putting foreign chemicals in your body, you can start to see how these people came to their conclusions. It's not *intended* to be malicious, even if it's actively causing harm. I have no trouble understanding the thought process and suspicions of these people, even if I disagree.

Unsupported conclusions, absolutely. But if you don't trust the people telling you they are unsupported (pharmaceutical companies, government, etc.), that's how you get to that mindset. And it's a default position of *not* wanting to do something to your body that you don't understand.