Being forced to allow another person the use of your body without your consent is being a brood-mare for the state. The state cannot force you to donate blood or bone marrow to save the life of your own 10-year-old child, but it can force you to undergo an even more dangerous and intrusive experience to save the life of a "child" whose cells haven't even differentiated into different tissues yet? No.

Consent to sex =/= consent to pregnancy. The "you were responsible for creating that child" argument is nothing more than an attempt to shame women for having sex.