The op of this subthread talked about wanting ideas to float around free and disconnected from specific voices, which is at best a nice lie because all ideas have sources and those sources must be thought about.
i'm sorry but i disagree. i'm afraid that i'm unwilling to get into it because it is an utterly long argument. i've had the most dismal experience of going through the process before, and have no wish to repeat it.
i'm so glad you felt the need to hint at your credentials. truly, i do understand now why you are against the proposal. unwise in your case, as it must be said, but understood at any rate.
Re: anon
i'm sorry but i disagree. i'm afraid that i'm unwilling to get into it because it is an utterly long argument. i've had the most dismal experience of going through the process before, and have no wish to repeat it.
i'm so glad you felt the need to hint at your credentials. truly, i do understand now why you are against the proposal. unwise in your case, as it must be said, but understood at any rate.