[ SECRET POST #2673 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2673 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

Nope, the misgynistic pig is still running things into the ground.

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

Shamelessly producing television that wins national and international awards even with the popular votes! How dare he do that, how dare he. What is more likely, a few SJWs are the only people who can see the truth about Moffat, or a few SJWs are whiny twats who have no idea what good television actually is?

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

doctor who

good television

you're joking right

even without moffat doctor who is campy and ludicrous as shit

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

That doesn't make it bad, anon.

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

i'm not saying that makes it bad.

i'm saying it's not outstanding television, especially with all the problems it's had the last several seasons. it definitely deserves the criticism it gets, as the writers don't seem to give a crap that they're writing crap.

Re: Question

[cushlamochree]

Or maybe they just disagree with you on taste.

... and also wildly over-exaggerate the validity of their dislikes I guess.

Re: Question

[arcadiaego]

And awards always select the best material to win. The Oscars have proved that times beyond number.

Re: Question

[(Anonymous)]

You could at least try and spell "misogynistic" correctly.