case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-01 07:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #2676 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2676 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #382.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

#10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
but I figured if I replied to the secret it'd be a little off topic and probably get buried. Hence a post here. Any thoughts on this article?

http://www.avclub.com/article/bechdel-test-fine-just-way-it-203956

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the bechdel test isn't the be all and end all of how feminist a work is, but I'd agree it's a decent indicator of female presence in a work.

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
I mean this is kinda referred to in the article, but would anyone actually go see a movie based solely on it passing the Bechdel test if they had no interest in it previously? To make it easier, assume it passes with relatively meaningful/not stereotypically cliche dialogue between the women.

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
OP here

I admit I wouldn't. Now if it's about a woman who's been abused by another woman and goes to face her demons, I'll fork over the money for a ticket, because that would at least have potential.

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
This is meant to be flippant or dismissive, just the first thing to come to mind: So basically a stereotypical Lifetime movie, but played out solely with women?

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
OP

I think you might have forgotten a word in the first part of your reply. To answer your question, I was thinking more of a Boy A-like film or maybe even making a female-centric version of La Haine. Those aren't the exact plotlines I had in mind, but those movies embody the tone/aesthetic I'd enjoy in a movie pertaining to women who have been abused in some way by other women.

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
I agree - of course the Bechdel test is limited, I think everyone knows that by now, but it's perfectly fine for what it is.

I think, even more than the Bechdel test, what's interesting to me is how few movies fail the reverse Bechdel test.

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
Where two men talk about something other than a woman? Because I think if that's what you're referring to, I think The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly passes, I think, I can't remember all of it, considering it is a three hour movie (that I saw on Monday).

Re: #10 reminded me of this

(Anonymous) 2014-05-02 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
I think the vast majority of films pass the reverse Bechdel test (where two men talk about something that isn't a woman). That's kinda my point.

The Good The Bad And The Ugly is super good though