fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2681 ]

[ SECRET POST #2681 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2681 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #383.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I'm all for people who want to exercise their right to use trigger warnings in order to help other people, but I can't quite get over the inappropriateness of this one: sexual assault/harassment (doesn’t go beyond some creeper-y stuff)

Like, aside from not knowing what it's referring to (in "It's the Great Pumpkin, Sam Winchester" - ep 4.7 of SPN), why are we diluting assault to "you're being 'creeper-y' whatever the fuck that means".

"Creeper-y" is exactly how I would define many "mild" forms of sexual harassment. Not assault, of course, but I have in fact been triggered by sexual harassment that can only be described as "creeper-y stuff", so I'm always glad for that warning. Conflating it with rape, though, not so much. There's a massive difference.

Well, I mean... http://i.imgur.com/tTeAVsk.jpg

I mean that cannot be for real

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ SECRET POST #2681 ]

Since when is this "assault"

Re: Since when is this "assault"

Re: Since when is this "assault"

Re: Since when is this "assault"