[ SECRET POST #2681 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2681 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #383.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[blitzwing]

I don't understand this kind of thinking at all. Writer's styles are often really distinctive, to the point where authors who were writing anonymously or pseudonymous have been outed. Both with professional writers and with say, kink meme writers, who had become easily recognizable even though they were posting anon.

Likewise, with themes/content--if you commission a dark-edgy writer to do a wedding scene, you're not going to expect a fluffy, happy wedding story.

But if you ask for a story about Spider-man riding a mechanical bull, who knows what you'll get.

Most people? I mean if you're familiar with the author's writing you'll know whether you're getting something funny or something introspective, shallow or deep. You know whether this author writes woobie-Loki or BAMF-Loki or whatever floats your boat.

The exact plot (does Spiderman get sick and throw up? Break the bull-riding record?) does not matter so much as getting the writing style, tone and characterization you like. If you're wanting really specific plot points those can be spelled out--there are plenty of incredibly detailed prompts just as there are vague ones.

Sorry for the tl;dr. It's just the "writing's a mystery!" stuff is baffling. I have to wonder how much all of you saying this read or pay attention to what makes up a writer's style...

[(Anonymous)]

I just think an artist style is easier to suss than a writer's style. But also, "style" isn't the issue. We're not talking about style, we're talking about content. When I commission something, and when someone commissions me, it's because I want a very specific piece of content. Content in art you can tell at a glance. Content in writing, not so much.

I mean, there are plenty of writers I like who still write things I didn't like. I dunno.

[(Anonymous)]

This, exactly. Especially this part:

I mean, there are plenty of writers I like who still write things I didn't like.

I have never encountered an author where I have liked every single thing that they wrote, ever. I can like their writing style but that doesn't always translate to the content of the work in a way that I like.

The only way to ensure that I get exactly the fic that I want to read would be to give them a detailed play-by-play outline of how I want the fic to go down, and by that point I might as well just sit down and write it myself since I've already written the entire plot outline there.

[blitzwing]

...Well I guess you're not the kind of person who'd commission fanfic then? And that's okay. But me, when I like an author, I usually like everything they write. I can think of tons of cases where that's true with both professional authors and fanfic authors. I even read fic for canons I've never watched due to that.

[(Anonymous)]

You said this so much better than I could have. It's not just about the plot and character that you're getting - it's the writer's style, all those shades that can't really be pinned down.