case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-11 03:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2686 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial opinions

(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
hetero, homo, bi, and asexual
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Controversial opinions

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-05-12 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
But what about the people who are attracted to animals or objects?

Re: Controversial opinions

(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think those groups need a sexuality label on par with the ones I mentioned.

Re: Controversial opinions

(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

I tend to consider those fetishes.

Re: Controversial opinions

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2014-05-12 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Normally, I'd agree with this. I'd say (according to my studies and readings on the subject) that in about 98% of cases, people fetishize animals or inanimate objects.

I think you're probably aware that a very small percentage of fetishists (for any fetish, really) are so attracted to the object of their fetish that they can't get aroused for anything else. There's a lot of debate about whether or not that constitutes a sexuality or a fetish at that point, and I'm somewhat on the side of terming it a sexuality in those situations.

Re: Controversial opinions

(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
When a fetish becomes, as you said, more than that, it is defined as a paraphilia.

Re: Controversial opinions

(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Ah, okay. I tend to not regard asexual as a sexuality (in the sense that *not* being a part of something doesn't make you part of the thing), so I was curious what you had in mind.