[ SECRET POST #2686 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: nayrt

[diet_poison]

No? That is the definition of "necessities of life". They are the things that keep you alive.

Re: nayrt

[diet_poison]

How can you justify calling anything other than those a "necessity" though? A thing of great importance, sure, I can agree with that. But a "necessity"? What is your definition of the word "necessity"?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

That seems to be rather flawed logic to me. Everyone needs food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, and education, but there are plenty of people who are perfectly happy without sex or intimacy or even actively reject it for whatever reason.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I suppose I'm just wary of classing sex as a 'need' because it seems to me like you could use that to justify some skeevy things, like marital rape.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Well, no. The only actual things people need to survive on that list are food and shelter. People can get on without clothing, healthcare, or education. And there are perfectly happy people who do.

Re: nayrt

[diet_poison]

Hm, yeah, that puzzled me when I first learned about it. Especially because I was getting along just fine without sex, and still am, even though I'm definitely not asexual. I won't claim though that everyone's experience is going to be the same though.

Logically speaking, you don't need sex to live, and I personally think that people need to consider the consequences of their decisions when I make them. EXTRA BOLD CAVEAT: the government doesn't need to do it for them. I just wish individuals would be more careful.