[ SECRET POST #2686 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

Ok, I guess if everything you have an opinion about has to come with an idea that it needs to be legislated. I think the reason this has blown up so much is that an opinion was stated with zero connections to legislation and a bunch of people assumed legislation had to be part of it. Because literally, you and fingals and some anons mentioned legislation before ANYONE agreeing with OP, and now you all seem mad that we don't really want to talk about that because that wasn't OP's opinion. (nor is it mine.)

I've given this a lot of thought, though. I slept on it and thought about it through today. I want to be really clear that I agree with your legislative stance, and I understand where you're coming from in being wary of opinions that can lead to bad legislation. I respect that. I was just really taken by surprise when suddenly people started getting really upset about something that wasn't originally part of the conversation, at least from the way I was reading it.

Re: Controversial opinions

[diet_poison]

mentioning those situations =/= acting like that's the opinion of people here who haven't said it. Seriously stop throwing links at me now, I genuinely appreciated it the first time but now it's like you're trying to prove to me something I already agree with. It's pointless.

I also continue to contend it's a huge jump from "I wish people who are not currently financially stable would wait to have kids" to "I think certain demographics are unfit to have kids". Bringing it up is one thing, but it literally sounded like those first comments were accusing some people here of holding those opinions when they didn't bring them up at all. And you continue to act like people disagree with you on legislating reproductive rights.