Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-11 03:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #2686 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2686 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial opinions
(Anonymous) 2014-05-12 07:39 am (UTC)(link)I think the best way to illustrate it is being attracted to people who identify neutral/other/third/no gender, in addition to people identifying as male and female.
Whereas someone identifying as bi may be attracted to people who identify as male & female, for example, or people who identify as neutrois & female, but not ALL expressions of gender.
How people USUALLY define bisexual & pansexual are: "attracted to men & women" and "attracted to ALL genders including trans!", both of which end up causing wank all over tumblr.
That made a lot more sense to me when someone explained it, anyway. And it seems to eliminate a lot of the debate about transphobia. (Obviously there's still problems with it, but these are the definitions I feel are least shitty to everyone involved.)
Re: Controversial opinions
(I spend very little time on tumblr)