[ SECRET POST #2687 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2687 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Breadth vs. depth in writing research

[(Anonymous)]

OP -- Thank you very much! I know that it's the second, "good to know" type of worldbuilding that's most on my mind, in the sense that I don't think or want every detail to be spelled out for the reader, but I do want to make sure that what I write reinforces the world, or at least doesn't outright contradict it (re-reading some of my much older stories with worldbuilding attempts, I've come across scenes that I remember being so convinced were clever twists or commentaries, but really just raised wayyy more questions). Thinking in terms of multiple passes will be helpful, too -- thanks again!