case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-13 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2688 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2688 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Frozen]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Criminal Minds, Elle Greenaway]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Utopia]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Prison Architect]


__________________________________________________



06.
[One Piece]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Orphan Black]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Craig Ferguson]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Sarah Rees Brennan]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Knights of Sidonia]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Are you sure?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-05-14 12:02 am (UTC)(link)


Are you really sure



Middle Eastern terrorists weren't a thing before 9/11

mechanosapience: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] mechanosapience 2014-05-14 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I think mekkio has a point, though. Yes, there were Middle Eastern terrorist villains before 9/11, and there are still Russian/Eastern European villains after 9/11, but from my observations, the ratio has shifted heavily toward the former.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] mekkio 2014-05-14 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, they were around before then but they were out numbered greatly by Communist villains to the point that it was surprise when they did pop up rather than the Russians.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-05-14 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
If you don't see the differences between the way these were portrayed pre- and post-War on Terror, you're not paying attention.

Re: Are you sure?

(Anonymous) 2014-05-14 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
+1
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-05-14 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
...yeah, you're not Arabic. We were kind of noticing this stuff.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-05-14 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
Care to expand on that, or is this "you're wrong because I say so, whitey, nyah nyah"?

The middle eastern terrorists portrayed during the Cold War were often for comedic effect, easily dealt with by the protagonist, and their rationalization for terrorism not taken very seriously. The Soviet antagonists were far more likely to be the serious threat, their ideologies given gravitas and a sense of menace.

Post 9/11, said middle eastern terrorists were taken more seriously in many of the works in which they appeared.

Note that I never said they weren't there (I know they were, I'm older than you, I've likely consumed as much if not more Western media), you haven't noticed shit all that I haven't. If anything, apparently, you've noticed less.

Unless you'd like to try again with a real argument and/or founded assertion this time?
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-05-14 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
Care to expand on that, or is this "you're wrong because I say so, whitey, nyah nyah"?

Haha, oh wow.

The middle eastern terrorists portrayed during the Cold War were often for comedic effect, easily dealt with by the protagonist, and their rationalization for terrorism not taken very seriously. The Soviet antagonists were far more likely to be the serious threat, their ideologies given gravitas and a sense of menace.

I'm not precisely arguing with this, though I'd disagree that they were generally for comedic effect. I only used The Libyans because it was a funny gif. But to act as if they weren't there in large numbers is silly. I'm not saying the portrayal didn't change, simply that they were still everywhere. It was difficult for male Arab actors who couldn't pass to get roles that weren't related to terrorism.

I suggest looking at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reel_Bad_Arabs
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-05-14 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
But to act as if they weren't there in large numbers is silly.

I didn't say anything about the numbers.

I'm not saying the portrayal didn't change

I specifically referenced their portrayal, and their portrayal alone.

So if you don't disagree, why did you respond at all?
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Are you sure?

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2014-05-14 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
I think the difference is that you may have seen the occasional on before, but the instance became a lot more common after 9/11 and soviet bad guys all but vanished.