[ SECRET POST #2689 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2689 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[dancing_clown]

My experience is that most people who make that claim about characters being evil just to be evil are doing it because they lack the desire or ability to look at said character as a complete person. Because it's harder to be righteously indignant about a villain once you've acknowledged that they're not one-dimensionally evil.

But the rest of the time, yeah. I've seen it used to apply to characters (usually one-note characters) who just want to rule and don't really have any reason or care for others.

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[icecheetah]

That's interesting! And makes me wonder how many "just for evil" villains are more complex than people think they are.

I don't understand "Ruling the world" as a motive. Even if you ARE evil you still need to put in enough effort to make sure things run smoothly enough for you to benefit. And that's stressful.