[ SECRET POST #2689 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2689 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[(Anonymous)]

I would define it as being evil without getting any particular benefit out of it, so "power" wouldn't apply because that's a benefit. I would hesitate to even include characters who are evil by natural instinct or because evil is the purpose of their existence (like demons and fantasy species with an "evil" alignment) because going along with their nature instead of struggling against it is also a kind of benefit. So actually, when I think of "evil for the sake of it" I think of characters where there's no benefit and also no in-universe explanation for their evilness. In other words, bad writing.

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[icecheetah]

If it's just bad writing then... well it seems a shame that the impression I get is such villains are common, even if I personally usually see a motive of some sort by the end.