[ SECRET POST #2689 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2689 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[cushlamochree]

Characters who do things because they are evil, or who do bad things just because. Like Luther from The Warriors. Why did he assassinate the gang leader, blame the Warriors and spend the entire movie trying to kill them? He just likes doing things like that. He's just a crazy, violent dude. There's no other motivation given in the movie, and there's not really any other explanation needed.

I don't think it's necessarily bad writing, though, unlike some. I think it's fine. It's different than other kinds of villains, certainly less complex, but it's not bad.

Re: A small question on what "Just for evil" means.

[icecheetah]

Anything can have a place in writing. Even things that are usually bad can sometimes just work in the story.

So yeah, not necessarily bad writing.