[ SECRET POST #2691 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2691 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















11. [WARNING for sexual assault, rape, bullying]

[Akuma Kyoushi]


__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for dub-con?]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape, pedophilia, etc?]

[X-Men: Days of Future Past]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #384.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Considering the -- to my knowledge -- relative numbers of biological children vs. adopted children, when two fictional characters have a parent-child relationship I assume biological unless there is reason to believe otherwise.

On the other hand, if one character is known to have parented another character, their referring to that character as their child does not provide any additional evidence of biological relationship.

I don't know the fandom or the argument, OP, so I have no idea whether I agree with you.

OP

[(Anonymous)]

In the early part of the comic, you're led to believe that she's adopted. There are hints later on that she's not, which sparked debate in fandom, and during that, people would say "well, he calls her his daughter, so they must be biologically related."

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Well, that being the case, that's a pretty assholey argument and I don't blame you for being annoyed by it.