[ SECRET POST #2692 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2692 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Non-fandom secrets

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Depends on the state. I do believe in NY you can be put on the sex offender registry if your caught and convicted for peeing on the sidewalk.

Which is why as much as I like the sex offender registry, there definitely needs to be an overhaul and a redefinition of what and who precisely belongs on there, because A)there's a world of difference between a child molestor and somebody who ended up there because they sexted naughty pictures of themselves to their boyfriend in high school, or relieved themselves on a sidewalk in which case B)some states do not specify why somebody ends up on a sex offender registry in the first place which can lead to some serious problems and even danger for those who ended up it because of a moment's stupidity that had nigh malicious intent.

Re: Non-fandom secrets

[diet_poison]

Wow, that's...yeah. I totally agree. You don't belong on the sex offender registry for peeing on a sidewalk. You should get in trouble for that, but not that kind of trouble. It also kinda waters down the whole thing, if you think about it. Being a sex offender is srs bsns, and it should indicate someone who is actually dangerous, not someone who might be because they decided to broaden the definition too much.