[ SECRET POST #2693 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - blank image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[chardmonster]

If you're defining "personally" so broadly that I can never talk about education without it being "personal," then yes, I suppose it's "personal."

So yes, let's make it personal: this person strikes me as the kind of student who tries to skate by. That prof did everything right, including warning the students ahead of time and putting violence in the actual name of the class, and the poster is acting as if this was so hard to deal with that they just had to read summaries instead of actually doing classwork. I take solace in the fact that, as an educator, I've personally seen that it's really fricking easy to tell when a student is only using wikipedia knowledge.

Thanks for the feedback, but again, this is lame. I'm going to treat it as lame. This does not seem to be what you were doing with wikipedia at all. We all use wikipedia. The profs use wikipedia. This is cheating.

Edit: Arg, sorry. This is me trying not to be pissy. I'm in a bad mood.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[feotakahari]

Can we just call an avoidance truce? If you don't comment on anything I post, I won't comment on anything you post. (If I forget, slap me with a metaphorical trout.)

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

Anyone here can comment on whatever they want. If you don't want to respond to someone just...don't respond to them.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

Don't let that hateful bitch stop you from posting.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[diet_poison]

I don't think you sound pissy, at least not right now. You sound blunt, and I don't mind blunt - I am rather blunt at times. But the way you worded the first comment I replied to was just downright rude imo.

I guess I take the stance with feo's position that I don't know enough about what was going on there. I'm gonna stay neutral on that one.

Thanks for the response and the explanation though. :)

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

Who cares if they cheated or not? It isn't like they cheated on an important exam for a licence to be a brain surgeon. They're in college. They are PAYING for their own classes. It has literally nothing to do with you or the prof.

So just calm those calamities that are your mammaries.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

So just calm those calamities that are your mammaries.

Not getting involved in the argument but I love this line in general.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[chardmonster]

And you are part of why the system is going to shit. Congratulations. I hope you're proud of how worthless your education was.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

[(Anonymous)]

You don't care about cheating in college? And it doesn't matter as long as people are paying for their classes? If they weren't paying for them, I presume it wouldn't matter then, either.

And if all this cheating doesn't matter... then, where, exactly do you think people honestly get their credentials to become brain surgeons, doctors, nurses, pilots, etc.?

I'm hoping you're a troll, and that this isn't your actual "informed" opinion.