case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-18 03:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #2693 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - blank image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: So trigger warnings finally made the New York Times

(Anonymous) 2014-05-19 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Geez, Chard. I figured they meant that they thought they were prepared and then realized they weren't?

But I don't see how looking up written descriptions of a film in question would be cheating. I mean, if someone is visually impaired, they'd likely need to look up textual descriptions to be read, but that wouldn't stop them at all from understanding the potential impacts of violence in films, or the history behind it, etc.