[ SECRET POST #2695 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2695 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's really been the reality for a long time, including for most of the history of the US (where I live and where I encounter most of the handwringing about "irresponsible" young people living "at home".

The boom in single-family homes in the US and the expectation that everyone would be sorted into homeowning nuclear families by 25 or whatever -- that was a mid 20th-century anomaly. And even during the single-family housing boom in the 50s and 60s, working-class people in their 20s still lived with their parents before marriage as a general rule, and often after marriage to save money.

The expectation that you have to have your own home in order to be a grown-up is what's new, historically speaking -- not the suckiness of the economy (though it does suck a lot right now and that's relevant) or the laziness / entitlement / whatever of young adults.

[(Anonymous)]

Australia, too, for similar reasons.