Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-20 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2695 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2695 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Cynical AYRT
(Anonymous) 2014-05-21 01:12 am (UTC)(link)IDK, apparently it's transphobic somehow, because... your guess is as good as mine.
The best ones, though, are the ones who dug deep enough to figure out that "Conchita" is, as a proper name, a diminutive of "Concepción", which refers to the Immaculate Conception, and skipped riiiiiiiight to making the name as a whole mean "The Virgin Mary's Sausage". Blasphemy! Misogyny! *clutches pearls*
First anon
(Anonymous) 2014-05-21 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)2. I don't find the name offensive, but I DID think it was a joke about the gender barriers Conchita shatters by her mere existence. It's essentially a lady with a beard who calls herself Pussy Dick. That isn't the kind of character that normally demands to be taken seriously.
3. Which, yes, is my problem with the way tumblr worships her: An openly gay man just won the Eurovision Song Contest in a dress. Shouldn't we be celebrating that, instead of treating his drag persona as if she was a real human being?
Re: First anon
(Anonymous) 2014-05-21 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: #3 though, considering the following are direct quotes from interviews:
"She's very real."
"I always say that I lived though a second puberty as Conchita. To put it as simply as possible: I think that this always was there, and that I went through a process of development until I breathed life into the woman with beard. I think one of my first memories is, when my grandmother said to my mother, I was like, 4 or 5 at the time I think: "Just let her go out in the skirt already, or we’ll never be done here".
[Interviewer: Which one do you prefer?] "I need both." [Depending on the moment?] "Yes, and I also notice that when I spend a lot of time in the studio, or don’t have any public appearances for a while, I start missing all of this. Just like I get fed up with her, I also get fed up with him."
"Conchita covers so many of my needs. Not only because I feel more free on stage, or because I am able to convey my message more easily; it is also because of some trivial things like I love to wear high heels or I love to paint my face or have my makeup done, and that is very much what is my truth."
I dunno, doesn't sound to me as just a drag persona. Yeah, she's not actually trans, she's just dressing up, but it feels to me there's more than just the performance.
There's also the fact that -- and this was also openly said in interviews -- she prefers Tom to remain strictly as a private person, and Conchita as the public one. For Conchita to be real, or at least "real enough", is clearly what she wants, so why is that happening a problem?