[ SECRET POST #2695 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2695 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[inkdust]

It's the difference between "white" as a skin color and "white" as a category of people relative to the social strata.

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

"white" as a category of people relative to the social strata

But WHY and how is that a thing? White is a race, period. It doesn't make sense otherwise. Would a black person in the same social category actually be considered white?

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[inkdust]

To my knowledge it's very much a historical thing. As we use the term now, white refers to a race, but during the Colonial Period and during all the immigration to the US from Europe, there was a social dichotomy of White vs Other. If a person fell into the social category of Other, not welcome or perceived as lesser, which included various European immigrant groups at different times, they would not be classified as white, because a person couldn't be both white and Other. As various groups were accepted into society, like the Irish, they became recategorized as white, because they now fit. It's not going to make sense based on our usage of white as a race.

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[(Anonymous)]

One thing it's interesting to see is how much the racial caricatures look like each other. Early 19th c. Irish caricatures look A LOT like the black caricatures that were going around at the same time, even though actual ethnic Irish people and actual black people don't tend to look that much alike in RL -- the cartoon versions shared a lot of physical features like apelike mouths, big feet, long arms. . . Anti-immigrant cartoons from 1900 of scary Mediterraneans look A LOT like anti-immigrant cartoons today of scary Mexicans, and so on. It's all about the Other vs. "our" jobs, women, religion, culture; who gets otherized changes according to a bunch of factors.

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[(Anonymous)]

It's not really, though, if by "race" you're thinking "group of people closely related to one another genetically" or something like that. Whiteness in the US at least is more like a fraternity that's picky about how you look, but also about how you act and who your friends are. "Italian" and "Greek" worked their way into the fraternity, while "Mexican" and "Lebanese" (for example) were kicked out -- but not because the range of skin tones was particularly different among those groups.

Some very pale black people passed for white and became socially white -- but this meant cutting off ties with friends and family, since a blonde, blue-eyed person with one or more black parents would not be considered white. Walter F. White, an early NNACP organizer, had blonde hair and blue eyes and sometimes passed as white for his own safety, but he lived in black neighborhoods and identified as black because his parents had been slaves. His family was able to escape the 1909 race riot in Atlanta because they looked white, but if they had stayed in their own neighborhood they would have been attacked along with their neighbors.

It's complicated I guess is the answer. . . sorry to tl;dr

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[(Anonymous)]

In that context it's more of a cultural thing than specifically about the way someone looks, which makes sense. I kind of see "white European immigrants" as different than "black people who can pass for white" although I can't quite explain how.

I thought Walter F. White was mixed race? From my experience mixed race people usually seem to be seen as whatever race they appear to be. Like pretty much everyone considers Barack Obama to be black ("the first black president" and all that stuff) even though his mother was white. But then when you get into fractions and who's what percentage of what race it all seems to kind of lose meaning almost, like what's even the point of categorizing people by race?

I don't know, I guess you're right...it's complicated.

Re: What are regional cultural differences in the USA?

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, he was mixed race -- but so were a very large number, maybe the majority, of "black" former slaves in the US. He was "black" because his parents had been slaves and their parents were slaves (and slavery in the US was racialized ,and they chose to live in a "black" neighborhood and maintain relationships with their black friends and family) even though he looked indistinguishable from or "whiter" than the white-supremacy crowd.

Walter F. White is an extreme example, but not an overwhelmingly uncommon one. One of the things abolitionists liked to shock people with was the very large number of white-appearing young slave women who were sold to brothels. They were popular with brothelgoers because they looked white, but were "really" black and therefore were enslavable and seen as having no intrinsic honor to lose.

us race relations have a long history and it's a history made entirely out of fucked-upness, what can I say.