Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-25 03:57 pm
[ SECRET POST #2700 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2700 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 099 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-25 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)I think what gets to me is how limited the vocabulary and sentence structures are by the target audience. If you read fic, even stuff that's praised for being in-character, the ponies don't talk like they do on the show, they talk in ways that represent their personality and experiences. On the show, they all sound very similar despite wildly different backgrounds, and I personally can't suspend my disbelief for that. If you can, more power to you.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-25 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-25 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 01:16 am (UTC)(link)(I'm kind of amazed this is a point of debate. The vocabulary level is very different from shows for the 7-12 demographic.)
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 02:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)Dude, if you feel that angry over the question whether MLP is for 2 year olds or not you should really go outside, take a breather and reevaluate your values.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 07:27 am (UTC)(link)http://mlp.derpynews.com/mlp-neilson-ratings-age-comparison/
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-05-26 09:47 am (UTC)(link)I... what? How on earth do you think they all sound similar? If anything I'd say their drastically different speech styles is ESPECIALLY representative of this "kiddy" aspect you dislike.