[ SECRET POST #2702 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2702 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think fantasy's incompatible with ethical concerns but I don't think it's compatible with this sort of social realistic approach to ethical concerns and especially to the resolution of ethical concerns - especially the sort of big epic fantasy thing that ASOIAF appears to be located in. Rather ethical concerns are linked to the fantastic itself. Often they'll be made literal and manifest in the form of some big fantastic construct. Because that's what the central concern of epic fantasy is, and what the central conceit is.

So in this specific case, the kind of thing that OP is talking about, it doesn't make sense because the general ethical concerns of the work aren't displayed through the political conditions - they're depicted through the arcs of the characters and the broad strokes of the fantastic conflict. So Daenerys staying there wouldn't work - her most important role is the one that she plays in the magical fantastic element of the series. It's the most important to the plot as well as to the moral construction of the series. So the social realistic resolution of Daenerys fixing one specific city doesn't work because there are concerns that are more important to the work (eg, everyone getting fucking eaten by ice zombies).

[feotakahari]

So that interview where Martin talked about how Lord of the Rings made Aragorn a good king because he was a rightful king, without dealing with issues like tax policy, and how he wants to take a more realistic approach, all that was hot air?

[(Anonymous)]

It's pretty much impossible for me to see a way that's going to play out, yeah

I mean, those things clearly matter - that level of texture clearly exists in the world of ASOIAF, where it doesn't in Lord of the Rings. But it's difficult or impossible for me to see how it's not going to end up subsumed within the fantastic concerns of the novel.