Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-28 07:11 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2703 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2703 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
And I'm just like:...
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:48 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Secondly, that would imply that "bad men" and "good men" are somehow evenly distributed at the 1/9 ratio every day or every hour of your life.
This is untrue. I grew up with good men. I went to school with mostly good men. I am friends with good men. I have come across bad men, but they are rare in my life. And, on the other spectrum sadly there are people who grow up with a lot of bad men, in abusive homes. But not everyone at every time is evenly at danger from bad men - while they would be with your M&M"s scenario.
Thirdly, even if the logic would work, it's a horrible world view. It's basically saying: fear/distrust/avoid all men just to be sure, because a minority are bad and you never know. Replace "men" with "blacks" or "gays" and you can see how warped that logic is.
That's not how I want to live. That's not what I think a healthy attitude towards life is. Be aware of the fact that every person you do not know is unpredictable and might not have good intentions, sure. But don't create an atmosphere of fear between men and women - that's beneficial to no-one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:43 am (UTC)(link)+1000
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Not really, since not every handful of M&Ms is guaranteed to have poison in them. Some handfuls will be perfectly fine, there's even a chance that every handful up until the end of the bowl will be fine, just like some people are blessed to be dealing with only good men over the course of their entire lives. But all it takes is one bad M&M to get people killed. And while you're right in that it's not good to live in absolute dysfunctional terror of those few bad M&Ms, it's also not good to ignore the very real and dangerous existence of them. Fear and caution are two different things, and that's what the analogy is trying to say, to me: That women shouldn't be shamed for reasonable caution of a real threat.
But people do shame women for caution - especially guys who feel entitled to a chance, and then shame women yet again when things go badly for a woman because she gave the wrong guy a chance. Women are expected to psychically be able to tell good guys from bad, the good candy from the poison, and the analogy is trying to express how impossible that is, how all the M&Ms look the same, and how women shouldn't be treated as paranoid just for being wary of landing that one disastrously bad piece.
no subject
I'm not saying it's a fool-proof system, but it's not totally random either.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 03:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 02:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 05:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 03:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
In the context you say, that analogy can be an illustration. In itself, it just seems to be saying "never trust any men because some of them might hurt you".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 12:38 am (UTC)(link)That post was made by thefrogman, pretty much universally recognized as The Best Person On The Internet.
"shitty post" uh huh.
no subject
I'm sure it will be shattered again by tomorrow.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 00:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
And also if your response (the general you) to a woman sharing a personal story or experience of sexual harassment and assault and expressing anti-male sentiment is to be like "well not all men!" then shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down and stop making everything about you.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:17 (UTC) - ExpandTW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 02:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 03:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 05:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 07:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 10:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: TW: Sexual Assault
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 01:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 19:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 03:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 10:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 13:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 03:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 03:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 04:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 10:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 11:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 11:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 15:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 14:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 15:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 16:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 17:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-30 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 17:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-29 21:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 03:10 am (UTC)(link)Or how about 10% of all women kill children, that means that all women are dangerous to children, and they shouldn't be around them, right?
It's ridiculous.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 04:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-29 03:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject