[ SECRET POST #2704 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2704 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #386.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But shouldn't a site with as much weight as metacritic (I don't go there) have a system for community-weighing or moderating the weight of individual users?

Otherwise, that's pretty terrible.

[scrubber]

I assume you meant "individual reviewers" not "users" but I don't know. I know Rotten Tomatoes doesn't. And Metacritic might not because it it seems like a iffy system to implement, I know I see an ocean of trouble stretching out before me when I think about it. People dogpiling certain critics for ONE bad review and affecting their entire review history because of it, or companies telling people to downvote the critics of certain releases to undercut bad press. Stuff like that.

I just think that if you're an accountant who's bad at math, you should get a different job, and same if you're a critic with terrible taste. That's all.

[(Anonymous)]

I guess reviewers? You don't have to submit there to be weighted in their process? That would be even more weird.

But while that kind of trouble is definitely possible, it seems not to happen too much on sites that implement it.