[ SECRET POST #2706 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2706 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[needled_ink_1975]

In an antagonistic and scoffing manner = not helpful.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[(Anonymous)]

Listen, what's important here is that ill_omened knows more than all of us, and the Metropolitan Police are the best trained in the world. That's what this conversation has always been about.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[ariakas]

Naw the RCMP beat them at tazering mentally disabled people to death in airports by a miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiile.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[(Anonymous)]

+1000

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[(Anonymous)]

also just to clarify that this was, in fact, a sarcastic post

don't want needled_ink thinking that I am throwing shade on them

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[needled_ink_1975]

DUDE! please to make with the ".../sarcasm" tag thingy whatchamacallit!

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[needled_ink_1975]

Umm, no.

ill_omened's comments are best described as antagonistic, scoffing, and UNHELPFUL. The Mets would probably agree, but they'd start off in this thread by saying, "Please remember that self-defense skills and/or a weapon should never equate to a cocky, 'I-have-the-advantage' attitude." Why? Because that just *might* gently hammer home the first rule of self-defense which is this:

Don't Get in a Fight.

Scoffing, being antagonistic... Just plain unhelpful.

(and if you outed the aforementioned poster as MP, you're a fucking idiot)

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[(Anonymous)]

sorry yeah I was being sarcastic @ ill_omened for doing that shit and I should have made that clearer

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

[needled_ink_1975]

No sweat, see my other reply, re: ".../sarcasm" taggy thing.

:)