[ SECRET POST #2706 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2706 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fandom meta theories

[dreemyweird]

Knowing the shit that happened to popular 19th- and 20th-century writers, I cannot agree with you. The entitlement issue is as old as the Lascaux drawings. I can just imagine a random caveman walking up to the artist and telling him some complete nonsense about his preferred drawing techniques.

Re: Fandom meta theories

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT Have you got an example you can give us? That sounds really interesting.

Re: Fandom meta theories

[dreemyweird]

I think my favourite story is about Conan Doyle's being physiognomized by an Egyptian policeman who was given written instructions based on the SH stories. The man told Doyle that he 'showed criminal tendencies'.

http://books.google.ee/books?id=f2HGhZki-8MC&pg=PA1848&lpg=PA1848&dq=%22criminal+tendencies%22+Conan+Doyle&source=bl&ots=mwkDQXbOdM&sig=v7opG-vsbGcqcCvsGdxE2JdWC1Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=KGiKU5iDGs714QSLtoGoCw&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22criminal%20tendencies%22%20Conan%20Doyle&f=false

Not sure if that's the kind of thing the original anon meant, tbh, but the obnoxiousness and pervasiveness of Doyle's fanbase was truly astounding.

I'll post more links if I can get them; the issue with 20th-century poets, in particular, was that there was way more direct poet-to-public interaction than there is now. So entitlement was inevitable.