case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-05-31 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2706 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2706 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-05-31 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Sam Colt called his gun "The Great Equalizer."

Welcome to the wonderful world of Sales, Marketing, and PR. Connection to reality: optional.

You would leave me completely defenseless No, it would merely take away the illusion of defense. You already are, for all practical purposes, defenseless. What you have is the dangerous illusion that you aren't, which may give you undue confidence and lead you into dangerous situations that you would otherwise avoid. Guns don't kill people, a false sense of security kills people.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-05-31 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, okay, so you're in the "lie back and think of England" camp and can be safely ignored.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Translation: I have no real rebuttal to that, so I'll wander away now.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
No, actually: Translation: I don't need to rebut an "argument" that's stupid on the face of it.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
It isn't, though. Your responses have been. And you've still got nothing to say to it, it seems.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not a stupid argument at all. The reason you think it's stupid is because you don't want to entertain the possibility that you might be wrong.

It's not about lying back and thinking of England; it's about recognizing the fact that, if someone attacks you, then you're most likely fucked no matter what you do. That's reality. It sucks. But some day, you're going to have to face it like the adult you claim to be.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
And boom goes the dynamite.

Re: Suprisingly decent article on self defence

(Anonymous) 2014-06-01 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
No, that was Alfred Nobel who came up with dynamite not Colt.