[ SECRET POST #2708 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2708 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Degrassi Junior High/Degrassi High and Saved By The Bell]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Cinema Snob]

__________________________________________________



04.
[Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Silicon Valley]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Xavier Dolan]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sailor Moon]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Iwan Rheon]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Love Stage!!]


__________________________________________________



11.
[The Losers (movie)]


__________________________________________________



12.
[K-pop]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

Very true. They believe in literal interpretations when it suits them and their viewpoints and in a non-literal interpretation at other times. And even within the literal interpretation, they choose the definitions of words that best suit them (usually out of the English translations at that)>

[(Anonymous)]

usually out of ONE 400-year-old English translation, at that

[philstar22]

Very true. One translation that has already been proven to have inaccuracies. And ironically enough an interpretation that the Puritans, who they often idolize as somehow ideal Christians, hated. That has always amused me.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Yep. The Geneva Bible (what the Puritans used, although they started to abuse it too, after they crossed the Atlantic) is vastly different in certain places, than the KJV. Vastly. It was the favoured translation for George Fox and William Penn, and other early Friends (Quakers). There's a reason for that. The Quakers weren't by any stretch of the imagination Puritanical!!

[(Anonymous)]

SA

what *some Puritans used -- some of them used Wycliffe

[diet_poison]

Still aren't :)

[a_potato]

I am rather fond of the fundies who think that the King James version is the One True Version.

Yes, of course. The version written by a prick king who wanted to get away with shit is definitely more accurate than, say, the first Greek translation.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

I wish I could get a hold of an old King James Version. It apparently has unicorns in it, while the New King James Version doesn't. I like unicorns.