Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-02 06:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #2708 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2708 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Degrassi Junior High/Degrassi High and Saved By The Bell]
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Cinema Snob]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Silicon Valley]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Xavier Dolan]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Pacific Rim]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Sailor Moon]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Iwan Rheon]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Love Stage!!]
__________________________________________________
11.

[The Losers (movie)]
__________________________________________________
12.

[K-pop]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 02:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Your hypothesis - everyone chooses at some point if they're going to be attracted to an individual or not.
So to prove your hypothesis, take an individual i.e. your father. When did you decide not to be attracted to him? Or if I shouldn't assume you're not, alternatively, when did you make the conscious choice to want to have sex with him? And can you change your choice?
I mean, I don't think I personally could choose to be attracted to my father. He's my dad!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 02:29 am (UTC)(link)Under your definition of attraction can you explain why someone could not choose to be attracted to their parents? Why do you treat that suggestion as ridiculous?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 02:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 03:09 am (UTC)(link)I bet the AYRT wouldn't be able to work up a sex jones for a filthy raving piss-soaked stranger on the bus, though. Humans are attracted to certain things, and gender is a part of that, depending on orientation.
Also agree with the person above who reminds us that Jesus forgave many people who broke biblical law and preached love and acceptance.
no subject
In a less 'extreme' example though, if attraction was logical and 100% under control, no one would ever have a bad dating relationship. Or ever look back and go "Wow, they were a total loser, I was blinded by love!"
I've also seen the 'attraction is a choice' used to defend 'friendzoning' of, oh, that girl could choose to be attracted to me, but she chose not to. What a bitch!
no subject