case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-02 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2708 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2708 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Degrassi Junior High/Degrassi High and Saved By The Bell]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Cinema Snob]

__________________________________________________



04.
[Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Silicon Valley]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Xavier Dolan]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sailor Moon]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Iwan Rheon]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Love Stage!!]


__________________________________________________



11.
[The Losers (movie)]


__________________________________________________



12.
[K-pop]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #387.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
??? But Jesus didn't come to destroy the law? He came to fulfill it by living a perfect life and obeying it.

Matthew 5:17 - "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill." That's something Jesus "literally fucking said."

Could you cite your sources and show me ANYWHERE in the Bible where it says he destroyed the law?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
THIS THIS THIS

So both the liberals and the conservatives massively misunderstand the old testament thing. Jesus never said he was throwing out the OT. He said the EXACT OPPOSITE.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
DA, but then you better not eat a lot of foods and you better still burn animal sacrifices and shit.

As well, you realize what fulfill means, right? "Bring to completion." Abolish is destroy. He came to bring the Old Law to completion, which he did. And the Old Law is still around to learn from. But Jesus also kind of denounced a ton of them, such as the practice of stoning (which is a practice of the Old Law that you need to do if you are to follow it).

So either the Old Law doesn't apply, or it does and you don't get to cherry pick what you do and don't do.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
He is fulfilling the Old Testament because the guy says, or the folks who wrote the New Testament claim this guy is, the Messiah. Whose coming is a big deal in the Jewish religion.

I'm not even sure how you get this quote to mean he is getting rid of the Old Testament. He's saying the exact opposite.

He never says the Old Testament doesn't apply. He just says some extra stuff, too.

Either way, the New Testament still has homophobia in it, so kind of a moot point.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
The whole thing with the dietary laws was literal and symbolic, and was for a "theocracy" under God. But the moral laws are still valid and always have been. People keep bringing up Leviticus and saying "well, we can eat this stuff now, so all the laws are invalid!" Well, know what else that book condemns along with homosexuality? Incest and bestiality. You said we don't get to cherry pick, so fine, let's not cherry pick. If "homosexuality is a sin" is suddenly invalid because we can eat unclean meat, then all the other shit in Leviticus is fine too.

And as for the stoning, they were, again, a "theocracy", acting under God's direction as "judge, jury, and executioner". That isn't valid for us anymore because we're not a theocracy. But the punishment of death is still a thing, except it's GOD who'll be using it at the end of the world. The moral laws haven't changed; the players have.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-06-03 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
My justification for the immorality of, say, bestiality isn't based on Old Testament law. It's based on the fact that animals are capable of suffering and cannot consent to sex with humans.