case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-08 03:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2714 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2714 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13. [repeat]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: Fandom pet peeves

[personal profile] intrigueing 2014-06-09 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty much. Now, there are some canons where there's plot holes and ambiguous bits of unsatisfactory writing that *needs* explaining, but explaining it with romance (in cases where romance just is just so *not* the point of the show/book/whatever) rather than an explanation more thematically appropriate or that reinforces canonical material, and instead just replacing everything with "they're actually in love!" is so...insipid. It feels off-topic.